|
Post by foggyisback on Dec 1, 2023 3:30:12 GMT -5
Bobblehead #PuddinBoots got his butt handed to him by Newsom. Should end his candidacy.
|
|
|
Post by foggyisback on Dec 1, 2023 3:42:57 GMT -5
Liberty liberty liberty 😄
|
|
|
Post by foggyisback on Dec 1, 2023 3:49:37 GMT -5
#PoopMap
|
|
|
Post by foggyisback on Dec 1, 2023 8:51:34 GMT -5
Whuut
|
|
|
Post by foggyisback on Dec 1, 2023 9:17:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by foggyisback on Dec 1, 2023 10:10:44 GMT -5
Heard that Sandra Day O'Connor was dead and my first thought was, "She wasn't already?"
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Dec 1, 2023 11:03:53 GMT -5
Bobblehead #PuddinBoots got his butt handed to him by Newsom. Should end his candidacy. He looked so weak in that debate. And he was utterly crushed so many times, no matter how much Hannity tried to help him.
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Dec 1, 2023 11:05:10 GMT -5
Liberty liberty liberty 😄 You can tell when you're dealing with scum, based on if they support what is right, or close ranks with what is wrong.
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Dec 1, 2023 11:06:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by foggyisback on Dec 1, 2023 11:07:38 GMT -5
Santos is out.
|
|
|
Post by foggyisback on Dec 1, 2023 12:36:00 GMT -5
So he's not, like, totally gone 🤔
|
|
|
Post by forgottenlord on Dec 1, 2023 13:01:26 GMT -5
A BC Real Estate Lawyer named* "Naomi Arbabi" decided to "sue" her neighbor in the "Naomi Arbabi Court" for installing a divider on their patio. www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/bc-lawyer-pseudolegal-lawsuit-1.7025394The neighbor decided to countersue and decided to represent herself and asked only for 15K which she estimates would be the rough attorneys fees cost for the case. And did a pretty decent job citing a few actual Sovereign Citizen cases. Also for a referral for Ms Arbabi to the BC Law Society The court has delayed judgment. I'm wondering if the Judge is considering awarding more than the ask. Oh, and Arbabi is threatening to sue CBC in the Naomi Arbabi Court if they publish any story about her without her approval. *Bizarre side note: Naomi Arbabi claims she is not Naomi Arbabi. She is instead just a vessel who is called Naomi Arbabi. Which is a tool for dodging things like process servers.
|
|
|
Post by LA_Randy on Dec 1, 2023 13:19:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Dec 1, 2023 14:09:15 GMT -5
It is so 'brave' of Nikki to finally launch a...narrow side against Trump, after Chris Christie has been drop kicking Trump from day one. Trump isn't anything to be impressed by. He has the momentum of a basically cowardly GOP and a rabid insane base, but as a candidate you have how fight with a little bit more than finger wagging.
|
|
|
Post by phillippatUK on Dec 1, 2023 14:38:54 GMT -5
It is so 'brave' of Nikki to finally launch a...narrow side against Trump, after Chris Christie has been drop kicking Trump from day one. Trump isn't anything to be impressed by. He has the momentum of a basically cowardly GOP and a rabid insane base, but as a candidate you have how fight with a little bit more than finger wagging. Trump's lawyers are now arguing that because his oath of office didn't specifically say 'support the constitution' (just defend etc.) and that the Constitution is about punishing those that don't 'support' it, that he isn't bound by it
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Dec 1, 2023 14:50:28 GMT -5
It is so 'brave' of Nikki to finally launch a...narrow side against Trump, after Chris Christie has been drop kicking Trump from day one. Trump isn't anything to be impressed by. He has the momentum of a basically cowardly GOP and a rabid insane base, but as a candidate you have how fight with a little bit more than finger wagging. Trump's lawyers are now arguing that because his oath of office didn't specifically say 'support the constitution' (just defend etc.) and that the Constitution is about punishing those that don't 'support' it, that he isn't bound by it The worst lawyers', the shittiest client.
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Dec 1, 2023 14:53:24 GMT -5
It tells you everything you need to know about GOP; not only have they overwhelmingly supported the criminal Trump even after starting to be convicted for Fraud and sexual assault, but half of them voted, strategically, to keep Santos. So when they yammer on about law and order and all that shit. Just dismiss their asses with a pft...b**ch please...
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Dec 1, 2023 15:10:59 GMT -5
So it appears that IDF and Mossad got their hands on Hamas plans about a year ago, but dismissed it as aspirational and fantastical - something they stated Hamas was incapable of pulling off. Combine that will local observations about Hamas doing drills close to the area, where local commanders instructed soldiers to stop talking about that shit, you can see just how amateurish IDF and Mossad comes off. It is not just a complete failure from top to bottom, but add to that Bibi's instruction to move combat units out of the region in order to protect Settlers to continue stealing Palestinians homes in the West Bank. I wonder if some of the overreaction to this is the political class and IDF and Mossad failing so fucking hard, and opportunism used to level Gaza and steal more land. And given that the survivors of hostages and the attack is extremely critical of the current government, will this revelation reach enough Israelis to force Bibi out. You can certainly not blame Israel for Hamas brutality and bloodthirst, but it was made worse by the incompetence on display. IDF could have laid ready and absolutely brutalized the attack, safeguarding the many Israelis that were killed. And I'm not going to be conspiratorial and think Israel wanted this outcome. Not at all. This was a massive blunder, where local commanders displayed an enormous arrogance and Mossad having the details plan of the attack, couldn't even be bothered in setting up a smaller observation post to see if there was any truth to it. This is further proves, like I stated the other day, that Israel alongside Russia, have been mythologized. And as we see from the war atrocities, they're not even smart or good at hiding it. They honestly still think that persuading the western democratic nations to suck their cogs, somehow equates to appeasement, when you see the growing land swell of actual voters come out against it. Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by phillippatUK on Dec 1, 2023 15:19:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Dec 1, 2023 15:24:58 GMT -5
A perfect gift for people you hate.
|
|
|
Post by LA_Randy on Dec 1, 2023 15:33:08 GMT -5
Doubtful it will show up at my local grocer and would probably be reduced for quick sale within a week. My all time favorite cereal continues to be Honey Bunches of Oats, plain without the almonds. Best cereal ever and I am not a big cereal eater.
|
|
|
Post by forgottenlord on Dec 1, 2023 16:07:47 GMT -5
Random rant: the prequel trilogy would make so much more sense if Amidala was actually a hereditary Queen. I mean, the entire thing is a plot hole 'cause you know she was made a Queen because Leia was "Princess" but at no point did Leia get royal titles for Naboo nor would it make sense for there to be hereditary titles for an elected queen but whatever, but follow the ball. The trilogy wants us to believe that this planet elects their Queen and willingly elected a 14 year old and then elected her to the Senate. She needed to be that young to match Anakin's age (I mean, she's still 5 years older). Hell, a cut section of Episode II includes Amidala saying she wasn't the youngest queen ever elected. (Not sure if there's a deleted scene, it definitely made the novelization). Huh?
Ok, let's reframe the trilogy around it being a hereditary post.
The first thing that jumps out is: "Why did the Trade Federation choose Naboo?" Obviously, the answer is "because Palpatine could leverage his post as Senator" but it's an odd choice. Well, what if the answer is because its hereditary Monarch is a teenager? I mean, that was basically the modus operandi during the Middle Ages: kid on the throne, profit time! Only, surprise, by sheer luck she's able to escape and then they discover that she's got a pretty solid backbone and fights back effectively against them. They're defeated, she successfully negotiates an alternate treaty.
So how does she become Senator in Episode II? It could be by appointment but maybe she did run and because she led them so well during the invasion, they decide to elect her in her early 20s. It's a little young, but she's shown a political adeptness and a name recognition (actually, this lines up with what is official anyways). But she's still Queen and once there's an active danger against the Queen, it becomes necessary for her to return to Naboo which is why she allows it.
Okay, and then Episode III, the (seemingly) unmarried monarch is pregnant? That sounds like a pretty sizable scandal. It also justifies her fear at the pregnancy - apparently she's supposed to be worried that the current Queen will fire her even though they're a forward thinking enough planet to welcome kids as their elected rulers? But in a society that's backwards enough to have a hereditary monarchy, it makes total sense that there would still be assumptions about a woman's sexuality. Especially for the leader of the planet. It also justifies her not going back to Naboo at any point in the movie (other than there not being a need to): minimize the potential exposure to scandal by not going to the gossip of her court.
|
|
|
Post by phillippatUK on Dec 1, 2023 16:28:02 GMT -5
Random rant: the prequel trilogy would make so much more sense if Amidala was actually a hereditary Queen. I mean, the entire thing is a plot hole 'cause you know she was made a Queen because Leia was "Princess" but at no point did Leia get royal titles for Naboo nor would it make sense for there to be hereditary titles for an elected queen but whatever, but follow the ball. The trilogy wants us to believe that this planet elects their Queen and willingly elected a 14 year old and then elected her to the Senate. She needed to be that young to match Anakin's age (I mean, she's still 5 years older). Hell, a cut section of Episode II includes Amidala saying she wasn't the youngest queen ever elected. (Not sure if there's a deleted scene, it definitely made the novelization). Huh? Ok, let's reframe the trilogy around it being a hereditary post. The first thing that jumps out is: "Why did the Trade Federation choose Naboo?" Obviously, the answer is "because Palpatine could leverage his post as Senator" but it's an odd choice. Well, what if the answer is because its hereditary Monarch is a teenager? I mean, that was basically the modus operandi during the Middle Ages: kid on the throne, profit time! Only, surprise, by sheer luck she's able to escape and then they discover that she's got a pretty solid backbone and fights back effectively against them. They're defeated, she successfully negotiates an alternate treaty. So how does she become Senator in Episode II? It could be by appointment but maybe she did run and because she led them so well during the invasion, they decide to elect her in her early 20s. It's a little young, but she's shown a political adeptness and a name recognition (actually, this lines up with what is official anyways). But she's still Queen and once there's an active danger against the Queen, it becomes necessary for her to return to Naboo which is why she allows it. Okay, and then Episode III, the (seemingly) unmarried monarch is pregnant? That sounds like a pretty sizable scandal. It also justifies her fear at the pregnancy - apparently she's supposed to be worried that the current Queen will fire her even though they're a forward thinking enough planet to welcome kids as their elected rulers? But in a society that's backwards enough to have a hereditary monarchy, it makes total sense that there would still be assumptions about a woman's sexuality. Especially for the leader of the planet. It also justifies her not going back to Naboo at any point in the movie (other than there not being a need to): minimize the potential exposure to scandal by not going to the gossip of her court. Yeah, but we're talking George Lucas here Yes, the 'Queen' of Naboo is a title for a temporary elected position, not a inherited one, regardless of what you'd expect, so she ceases to be a monarch once she stands down, and becomes a Senator instead. And the reason Leia is a princess has nothing to do with Naboo, but the Organa family she joins on Alderaan. Yes, yes, I'm a nerd (I had some (Kenner) Star Wars figures, vehicles (AT-ST/Millennium Falcon) and stuff growing up, (mainly bought 2nd hand) which mainly involved making Lego catapults for Leia to launch Lego bricks or R2 units at Stormtroopers and Imperial vehicles )
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Dec 1, 2023 16:33:14 GMT -5
Random rant: the prequel trilogy would make so much more sense if Amidala was actually a hereditary Queen. I mean, the entire thing is a plot hole 'cause you know she was made a Queen because Leia was "Princess" but at no point did Leia get royal titles for Naboo nor would it make sense for there to be hereditary titles for an elected queen but whatever, but follow the ball. The trilogy wants us to believe that this planet elects their Queen and willingly elected a 14 year old and then elected her to the Senate. She needed to be that young to match Anakin's age (I mean, she's still 5 years older). Hell, a cut section of Episode II includes Amidala saying she wasn't the youngest queen ever elected. (Not sure if there's a deleted scene, it definitely made the novelization). Huh? Ok, let's reframe the trilogy around it being a hereditary post. The first thing that jumps out is: "Why did the Trade Federation choose Naboo?" Obviously, the answer is "because Palpatine could leverage his post as Senator" but it's an odd choice. Well, what if the answer is because its hereditary Monarch is a teenager? I mean, that was basically the modus operandi during the Middle Ages: kid on the throne, profit time! Only, surprise, by sheer luck she's able to escape and then they discover that she's got a pretty solid backbone and fights back effectively against them. They're defeated, she successfully negotiates an alternate treaty. So how does she become Senator in Episode II? It could be by appointment but maybe she did run and because she led them so well during the invasion, they decide to elect her in her early 20s. It's a little young, but she's shown a political adeptness and a name recognition (actually, this lines up with what is official anyways). But she's still Queen and once there's an active danger against the Queen, it becomes necessary for her to return to Naboo which is why she allows it. Okay, and then Episode III, the (seemingly) unmarried monarch is pregnant? That sounds like a pretty sizable scandal. It also justifies her fear at the pregnancy - apparently she's supposed to be worried that the current Queen will fire her even though they're a forward thinking enough planet to welcome kids as their elected rulers? But in a society that's backwards enough to have a hereditary monarchy, it makes total sense that there would still be assumptions about a woman's sexuality. Especially for the leader of the planet. It also justifies her not going back to Naboo at any point in the movie (other than there not being a need to): minimize the potential exposure to scandal by not going to the gossip of her court. Theyre still way better than the last trilogy. It was less regurgitated and it maintained the force lore. In the last trilogy everything just became magic of the moment. As for the plothole. I never really thought about it that much but it makes sense. It was clear that he had not fully hammed out from beginning to end eventho he had thought about it in big strokes, since he choose the mid trilogy as he wasn't sure the first 3 movies would do well. So it strikes me as odd that he didn't have at least the main cast thought out a little more.
|
|
|
Post by forgottenlord on Dec 1, 2023 17:01:27 GMT -5
Random rant: the prequel trilogy would make so much more sense if Amidala was actually a hereditary Queen. I mean, the entire thing is a plot hole 'cause you know she was made a Queen because Leia was "Princess" but at no point did Leia get royal titles for Naboo nor would it make sense for there to be hereditary titles for an elected queen but whatever, but follow the ball. The trilogy wants us to believe that this planet elects their Queen and willingly elected a 14 year old and then elected her to the Senate. She needed to be that young to match Anakin's age (I mean, she's still 5 years older). Hell, a cut section of Episode II includes Amidala saying she wasn't the youngest queen ever elected. (Not sure if there's a deleted scene, it definitely made the novelization). Huh? Ok, let's reframe the trilogy around it being a hereditary post. The first thing that jumps out is: "Why did the Trade Federation choose Naboo?" Obviously, the answer is "because Palpatine could leverage his post as Senator" but it's an odd choice. Well, what if the answer is because its hereditary Monarch is a teenager? I mean, that was basically the modus operandi during the Middle Ages: kid on the throne, profit time! Only, surprise, by sheer luck she's able to escape and then they discover that she's got a pretty solid backbone and fights back effectively against them. They're defeated, she successfully negotiates an alternate treaty. So how does she become Senator in Episode II? It could be by appointment but maybe she did run and because she led them so well during the invasion, they decide to elect her in her early 20s. It's a little young, but she's shown a political adeptness and a name recognition (actually, this lines up with what is official anyways). But she's still Queen and once there's an active danger against the Queen, it becomes necessary for her to return to Naboo which is why she allows it. Okay, and then Episode III, the (seemingly) unmarried monarch is pregnant? That sounds like a pretty sizable scandal. It also justifies her fear at the pregnancy - apparently she's supposed to be worried that the current Queen will fire her even though they're a forward thinking enough planet to welcome kids as their elected rulers? But in a society that's backwards enough to have a hereditary monarchy, it makes total sense that there would still be assumptions about a woman's sexuality. Especially for the leader of the planet. It also justifies her not going back to Naboo at any point in the movie (other than there not being a need to): minimize the potential exposure to scandal by not going to the gossip of her court. Theyre still way better than the last trilogy. It was less regurgitated and it maintained the force lore. In the last trilogy everything just became magic of the moment. As for the plothole. I never really thought about it that much but it makes sense. It was clear that he had not fully hammed out from beginning to end eventho he had thought about it in big strokes, since he choose the mid trilogy as he wasn't sure the first 3 movies would do well. So it strikes me as odd that he didn't have at least the main cast thought out a little more. For all the complaints about the prequels, I've watched every movie multiple times. My only real issue with the trilogy is the flirting in Ep 2 is unbearable. Sure, there's issues, but I find them relatively minor. I watched Ep 7 a couple of times and that's it. It was stupid but it was fun. Saw 8 and 9 in theaters once each. 8 I've got mixed feelings about* while 9 I can't hate because I'd need to feel.... anything. * I have no issues with sullen Luke and the exploration of the force was a very interesting take but Po's plotline is the worst misunderstanding of militaries and wars I've ever seen in a Hollywood movie. And fuck the Holdo maneuver which is the most beautiful scene in any Star Wars medium that simultaneously shreds the canon into itty bitty pieces as thoroughly as the Supremacy. Don't care about the other plot, it's just a weird adventure to pad the runtime.
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Dec 1, 2023 17:12:37 GMT -5
Fox is upset that polling shows that women don't want to date Trump supporters. Not conservatives, but Trump supporters and these women are going to find (this was delivered by a 'female' Foxer) they'll marry a bunch of Beta guys that want to split the check, won't open the door etc. Because that is what Trumpsters are so known for - classic male tropes.
They're going to be so tired of soft wristed liberals that given them space and possibly also treat them like equals, instead of strong burly mean with beards, that do all the shit we've seen in the movies from the 50's. And of course demand then to make sammiches and babies.
And not to mention the misogynist view of women as objects, the intolerance for different POVs and willingness to overthrow our nation on behalf of the scummiest and laziest fascist ever.
Poor women, they just don't know what they will miss.
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Dec 1, 2023 17:37:40 GMT -5
Theyre still way better than the last trilogy. It was less regurgitated and it maintained the force lore. In the last trilogy everything just became magic of the moment. As for the plothole. I never really thought about it that much but it makes sense. It was clear that he had not fully hammed out from beginning to end eventho he had thought about it in big strokes, since he choose the mid trilogy as he wasn't sure the first 3 movies would do well. So it strikes me as odd that he didn't have at least the main cast thought out a little more. For all the complaints about the prequels, I've watched every movie multiple times. My only real issue with the trilogy is the flirting in Ep 2 is unbearable. Sure, there's issues, but I find them relatively minor. I watched Ep 7 a couple of times and that's it. It was stupid but it was fun. Saw 8 and 9 in theaters once each. 8 I've got mixed feelings about* while 9 I can't hate because I'd need to feel.... anything. * I have no issues with sullen Luke and the exploration of the force was a very interesting take but Po's plotline is the worst misunderstanding of militaries and wars I've ever seen in a Hollywood movie. And fuck the Holdo maneuver which is the most beautiful scene in any Star Wars medium that simultaneously shreds the canon into itty bitty pieces as thoroughly as the Supremacy. Don't care about the other plot, it's just a weird adventure to pad the runtime. I thought the prequels were perfectly fine. There was some glitches in the matrix about how unengaged the romance was. I didn't feel any of it, but that I didn't watch it for the smooched. The action was perfectly fine and didn't go entirely overboard. And seeing Kenobi actually get somewhat of a personality was nice too. The Anakin stuff was a little bit like game of thrones. Going from good to evil was so entirely corny, particular since his motivation was to save his wife, but then ending up murdering a bunch of kids in the process was so out of place with where he was and what the motivations were. It was to somehow show that he had succumbed to the dark force, but the dark force per say doesn't make you cartoonishly evil, it just shows less restraints in your actions as self serving rather then empathetic. The sequels; entirely forgettable. Rehashed content, the super duper death planet, just another death star and the battle in the second movie, was just the Empire strikes back but so much dumber. The final battle was basically lazy CGI overload with some 'find X on the map' and where the force just became a mana pool with some green lantern 'imagine and it will happen' ability. The Emperor was no longer an evil plotting man behind the curtain. He was just a test tube evil, distilled from the idea of a super powerful being. That guy with the cut in his face and then was halved in the throne room scene was entirely pointless. He was never really explained and was about as effective as a molding turd. JJ Abrams did his dumb subverting the expected nonsense and the other guy for the middle part made Star Wars in a fucking joke. It is clear that the original movies were really the apex of all the movies and that Disney has more or less just commoditize the universe and made everything less wrapped in lore. Just as Marvel has turned super hero movies into a rinse and repeat with less appeal. And not because of the latest Marvel movie which I think suffers from characters that are unique to Disney + (such as with the latest Dr Strange and the Marvel girls). Not everyone has had a chance to watch it, so when they create these stuff as a bridge to something else, you feel like you're missing the plot unless you're entirely onboard with everything. Compare that to the prior phase 1 movies that slowly coalesced to the final 2 but were not needed per say for anyone that jumped into the end. Star Wars clearly suffered from the fact that the original 3 had such 'quality' and nostalgia to it, and the prequels hadn't figured out the plot very well, so the expectations of say Anakins fall, went from 0 to 100 without the arch that felt conformable in its landing. And I honestly fault JJ for his propensity of regurgitating old plot lines but with a twist. He did it with Star Trek (which I still liked because of the excellent characters) and he did it with the 1 and 3rd sequel. And the only thing that irked me more then the insanely evil emperor in the last movie, was that lazy CGI clutter. It wasn't an intimate fight against odds. It was so many ships that none of them felt vital to anything that happens. Take Rouge 1. A few ships jump in, in the end for the fight, with the desperate fight that follows, and I think it was just 2 star destroyers there first, followed by 1 or 2 more as Vader joined. It felt intimate, suspenseful, and with a great sense of loss. A perfect landing to go into the first original movie. In contrast the ending of the 3rd prequel felt robbed. Anakin turned into a super evil cartoon of what the third original movie showed, and the death his wife a footnote. Plus it further made the whole 'I have the highground' nonsense a perfect encapsulation of what everything had become. To note - I have Disney plus and have largely refused to even try to get into the many shows. I might watch Alderan since that seems to harken back to more of a Rogue 1 feeling, but there is one scene I've seen that I already hate. That is when the Empire ship with the massive force field takes hold of a ship (that part was not bad) and is destroyed by releasing these metal objects. All that was fine. But then the ship also have some kind of massive lightsaber like weapons on the side of it, so it can fly towards and enemy, rotate on its axel and destroy the smaller vessels by going through it. The force field, the released anti force field stuff - plausible. The chariot like force lances on each flank. Pure nonsense. No one would add that to a ship. No one. Extra auto turrets maybe, but fucking ship lightsabers? So lost the plot. Sorry for the rant. I do that from time to time and honestly if you ignore most of it, the take away is that I like the prequels, love the original 3 movies and absolutely loath what they did with the sequels. It is okay action with nonsense plot. It did all characters completely dirty.
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Dec 2, 2023 5:27:17 GMT -5
What an unserious claim. But that is Trump for you and the clowns he hire.
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Dec 2, 2023 8:26:10 GMT -5
I mentioned the other day that some rightwing lunatic had discovered a social media account there with the same name as Judge Engorons wife, and therefor, given the limited brain capacity, assumed it had to be Judge Engorons wife, given that the person in case was also critical of Trump.
Because in the reductive stunted world of the idiot brained, there can only be one person with that name, and if they are critical of Trump it HAS to be that person. There are absolutely no one else that are critical of Trump; only those that has something against him. In other words; it is not a reaction to the fact that Trump is a disgusting serial sexual abuser and fascist scum, people don't like him because of the magic R. Nothing else. It is just a HUGE conspiracy to get him. Someone release the deep state hate Trump gas and started hating him. Because he's so succesful and awesome and only wanted to make America great again. No one can possible dislike an awesome man like that.
So the person in question who did that A, B and C route of discovering this account is a complete lunatic called Laura Loomer.
She's your run of the mill brain rotted moron that infest the right. Where everything is a conspiracy and everything is a grift. And Trump is now running on this because regardless if Trump actually knows what is right from wrong, he figure he got cover by siting these lunatics. After all - he's no responsible for drumming up hatred against Engorons family; he's just going with the intelligence of these lunatics.
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Dec 2, 2023 9:50:17 GMT -5
Jesse Waters finds another made up grievance. Men shouldn't drink anything through a straw. It is unbecoming of 'maleness'?
Also, social media account where Jesse Waters show up his meal, he drinks through a straw.
Yeah. Very unbecoming. It must be exhausting being so oppositional to everything. But lets be honest here; it is not like they care. Their viewers are brain mushed anyways. Don't expect a lot of 'hey what?' to the inconsistency with the 'new rules'.
|
|