|
Post by foggyisback on Mar 20, 2024 3:12:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by foggyisback on Mar 20, 2024 3:14:06 GMT -5
Florida: Where "woke" goes to LHBO.
|
|
|
Post by foggyisback on Mar 20, 2024 3:15:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by foggyisback on Mar 20, 2024 7:37:05 GMT -5
Goons.
|
|
|
Post by LA_Randy on Mar 20, 2024 8:10:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by foggyisback on Mar 20, 2024 9:18:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by foggyisback on Mar 20, 2024 10:06:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Mar 20, 2024 12:07:58 GMT -5
Fuck those prissy bitches. They're paid and bought for. Once people start realize that the SC doesn't speak for people, the better. Once all confidence in the SC is gone, there will be a political movement to reform it. And I hope that means no more lifetime appointments.
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Mar 20, 2024 12:10:46 GMT -5
Imagine people falling for a guy that seems to be like a magnet to crime, the way flies like shit. Maybe this isn't a massive deep state operation against an amazing super innocent guy. Maybe he is just so corrupt and criminal, and unfortunately powerful, that it has taken this long to start taking his corruption down. And people who flock to him isn't interested in truth, facts and morals. They're just like the flies on shit. Drawn to it because they're dirty scum too.
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Mar 20, 2024 12:13:28 GMT -5
Trump keep whining about the fines against him. Keep on. Keep reminding people over and over just how weak, spinless, cowardly AND criminal that you are.
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Mar 20, 2024 13:17:39 GMT -5
Why the idiot right sucks at story telling. This is not new, or required say review of a shitty rightwing movie, but it details WHY the idiot right is so bad at stuff.
Take what the idiot right say is a 'woke' movie. About woke people doing woke things. Like say having female leads. If you look beyond the context of a movie, the cornerstone of good story telling is basically that there's a overt or subtle moral learning curve. People who are different and seems to hate each others fall in love. Bad people learn to be good. Good people triumph bad stuff but have a moral dilemma etc. These are simply things. Sometimes you can pull off a 'everyone lose' scenario but still have some kind of moral digestion (Platoon), other times it is just pure shit (Skyline). In Platoon it is an amoral war, told out of a perspective of grunts. There are no winners other than getting out alive.
Skyline is a TERRIBLE sci fi about no matter what humans do, such as sacrificing themselves for friends and family, it is all wasted. Air assault to blow up ONE alien ship when all of the attacking planes are shot down and they FINALLY just get ONE hit in. Nope, the alien ship crashes in a bawl of flames to the ground, and then magically repair itself with super duper alien technology. No wins, all suffering. Everyone will be killed or taken and the earth is ruined.
In this rightwing crap movie no one learns, because the idiot right always start with the premise that they're already ideal. Everyone else are falling short. Everyone else are overt political and money grubby, the right is just right. No matter what they do. The idiotic sermonizing, the hammy one liners and shitty comedy ends up with all hot women falling for them, regardless. No change needed; be your idiotic self.
That's not to say that some Hollywood movies have sold their own kool aid. Like JJ Abrahms box theory. Which is just another word for 'I am going to add something magical that I don't have to explain, and that subverts expected logic and reality and you'll going to go....woooooow.
It is just smokescreen fluff of course when you can't add things in a movie that 'makes sense' if say magic existed. Just as the idiot right simply can't dunk on themselves and have a story arch. They start out with a grievance, continue as winners and will never have to deal with the consequences of themselves.
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Mar 20, 2024 13:32:28 GMT -5
They need to remove Judge Cannon out of the court system asap. She's not just a rightwing lunatic, but now she's basically instructing the jury to figure out if someone can mindmeld consider top secret documents as their own, by just removing them from the government and stash them in the private bathroom. Basically, a president can remove stuff and THINK that they're their own, without the process of declassification and THAT the jury is suppose to do that work. Not a judge. Not the process as established for these things that everyone before Trump followed.
She's a fucking rightwing lunatic.
|
|
|
Post by forgottenlord on Mar 20, 2024 14:16:49 GMT -5
Former NHL Enforcers Konstantin Koltsov, 42, and Chris Simon, 52, committed suicide within 24hrs of each other. While you can't diagnose CTE pre-mortem, Simon was known to be struggling with symptoms of CTE. www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/nhl/nhl-chris-simon-obituary-1.7148949Koltsov had a very brief NHL career with the Pittsburg Penguins and ended up returning to the KHL where he saw greater longevity. Simon I'm fairly familiar with especially since he was on the Flames during the 04 cup run but he will likely forever be remembered for the time he decided to two-handed bat swing Ryan Hallweg in the face in retaliation for what would, today, be considered an illegal check into the boards. Simon was suspended for the balance of the season or 25 games, whichever was more (ended up being the 25). That incident routinely ends up in top 10 videos
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Mar 20, 2024 14:47:30 GMT -5
So this rightwing moron state senator, that is on a crusade against naughty books, because 'children' can't handle that, decided to do a floor speech that included reading a passage from a book by a woman that experienced rape. But he did this little 'story' thing where he used the name of a senator that is fighting against this kind of book banning BS. So instead of using the name of the rapist (in the book) he used the senators name. So clever. The idiot right and their 'burns'. Of course if there would ever be consequences for this type of BS this asshat would cry foul and 'mah free spuuuch'. There's something fundamentally broken with these small dumb, mostly men. BTW, it should be stated that this was directed to a female colleague. nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/03/18/lawmaker-is-called-to-resign-for-invoking-a-colleagues-name-in-rape-scene-during-debate/Not that this guy cares. He thought it made a point. BTW, what's wrong with rightwingers delight in reading these passages from books over and over? It is like they can't ever stop talking about underage girls and guys junk.
|
|
|
Post by forgottenlord on Mar 20, 2024 15:02:14 GMT -5
So this rightwing moron state senator, that is on a crusade against naughty books, because 'children' can't handle that, decided to do a floor speech that included reading a passage from a book by a woman that experienced rape. But he did this little 'story' thing where he used the name of a senator that is fighting against this kind of book banning BS. So instead of using the name of the rapist (in the book) he used the senators name. So clever. The idiot right and their 'burns'. Of course if there would ever be consequences for this type of BS this asshat would cry foul and 'mah free spuuuch'. There's something fundamentally broken with these small dumb, mostly men. BTW, it should be stated that this was directed to a female colleague. nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/03/18/lawmaker-is-called-to-resign-for-invoking-a-colleagues-name-in-rape-scene-during-debate/Not that this guy cares. He thought it made a point. BTW, what's wrong with rightwingers delight in reading these passages from books over and over? It is like they can't ever stop talking about underage girls and guys junk. In both Canadian and British Parliaments, you are not permitted to refer to a fellow member by name. If it was used when it wasn't supposed to, they'd be admonished. If it was used in a derogatory manner, the Speaker would interject, demand an apology to the member and/or the House and if no apology was given, the offending member would be ejected for the day.
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Mar 20, 2024 15:09:09 GMT -5
I am sure this doesn't come as any surprise, that Ramaswamy who argues that there should be no birthright citizens (he is one himself, he was born AFTER his parents came to this country and before his mom became a citizens, his dad is NOT a citizen), is considered for Homeland secretary in Trumps potential cabinet.
Which of course is no different than Justice Thomas who want to reconsider white and brown marriage, except for his own...because reasons.
Vivek will shit up a storm of words tho why it is okay that HE is a citizens and others not. You know. This and that stuff. You know, thingies. You take words, throw it in a pot. Add some water, maybe salt - then cook them long enough to become this paste. Then you make bake them into a pretzel or just into a wheel like device that you roll down the road and go weeeeeeeeeeeee. It doesn't have to make sense as long as you speak with conviction and talk really fast and never admit that what you're saying is not only hypocritical but utterly cringy. Just isert your head in Trumps ass already. You have the shape of the head for it.
|
|
|
Post by mrobvious on Mar 20, 2024 15:13:01 GMT -5
So this rightwing moron state senator, that is on a crusade against naughty books, because 'children' can't handle that, decided to do a floor speech that included reading a passage from a book by a woman that experienced rape. But he did this little 'story' thing where he used the name of a senator that is fighting against this kind of book banning BS. So instead of using the name of the rapist (in the book) he used the senators name. So clever. The idiot right and their 'burns'. Of course if there would ever be consequences for this type of BS this asshat would cry foul and 'mah free spuuuch'. There's something fundamentally broken with these small dumb, mostly men. BTW, it should be stated that this was directed to a female colleague. nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/03/18/lawmaker-is-called-to-resign-for-invoking-a-colleagues-name-in-rape-scene-during-debate/Not that this guy cares. He thought it made a point. BTW, what's wrong with rightwingers delight in reading these passages from books over and over? It is like they can't ever stop talking about underage girls and guys junk. In both Canadian and British Parliaments, you are not permitted to refer to a fellow member by name. If it was used when it wasn't supposed to, they'd be admonished. If it was used in a derogatory manner, the Speaker would interject, demand an apology to the member and/or the House and if no apology was given, the offending member would be ejected for the day. There is a veneer of fake decorum in American politics, but it shouldn't come as a surprise that the idiot right will frequently be disgustingly shitty, while holding 'protesting' against someone on the left. I think you have the same reaction in Sweden. You can't just go after other people by name. Altho in many other countries there's a time honored tradition of hair pulling and face punching. Personally I think Holloran has a perfectly punchable face. I bet he would fold like a chair if you did. People like that are usually only brave in words but act like whiny little bitches when they're called out.
|
|
|
Post by LA_Randy on Mar 20, 2024 16:35:32 GMT -5
LMAO
|
|
|
Post by forgottenlord on Mar 20, 2024 17:43:17 GMT -5
So did Comer not do his homework to figure out who they were interviewing that day?
|
|
|
Post by LA_Randy on Mar 20, 2024 18:40:27 GMT -5
So did Comer not do his homework to figure out who they were interviewing that day? If they had done their homework there wouldn’t have been any impeachment hearings to start with, so no.
|
|
|
Post by forgottenlord on Mar 20, 2024 19:29:22 GMT -5
So did Comer not do his homework to figure out who they were interviewing that day? If they had done their homework there wouldn’t have been any impeachment hearings to start with, so no. No, that's the difference between lying and stupidity. They're lying, they're going to hold these hearings on the flimsiest of excuses But if you're going to lie, why not prepare sufficiently that you can lie convincingly? That's the thing that I find the most breathtakingly stupid. It's not just that they're total fraudsters. They're not even good at it. Which, y'know, pisses me off all the more. Losing to Wayne LaPierre was depressing but you had to respect their operation - even as they were looting the fuck out of it. Losing to these dumbasses is just annoying.
|
|